The following PDF file is the report of my first
psychiatric assessment authored by Dr. Douglas McKibbin as per order of the Provincial Court in Richmond. The first four pages
were the original report handwritten by the doctor. The last two pages were my
recent transcription. The question marks in brackets donate words that I was
not sure about. For those few words that I could not make out, I simply left
them blank.
Unlike my later psychiatric assessments and/or examinations, I believe this first one was conducted by an honest doctor who had not been influenced by the federal government. There were, however, many inaccuracies in Dr. McKibbin’s report, as can be expected from a two- hour interview on a complex story that stretched back more than 13 years at that point. Obviously, my posting this document here does not mean that I endorse its every word. As I probably said before, the only thing that I am in complete agreement with is my own writing. Indeed, the reason I am posting this report here at all is because I see it as probably the only major court document that was not maliciously produced. That’s in fact one important reason why I would never give up seeking redress of my nightmare at that “kangaroo court” in New Westminster. I could never let so many of my court records stand uncorrected as they were intended to smear my character and attack my integrity on behalf of the political class.
I believe that, like the rest of my court-ordered in-custody
psychiatric assessments and/or examination, I had no benefit of legal counsel
before, during or after this one on March 14, 2007. Still, as can be seen from
Dr. McKibbin’s report, I was very cooperative with and showed no resistance to his
evaluation despite its voluntary nature. Indeed, it was only after I saw other
doctors come with a deliberate confrontational attitude and/or carry with them
an agenda for the federal government that I became mistrustful of and resistant
to these repeated assessments and/or examinations.
I should point out that, although Dr. McKibbin
largely cleared me psychiatrically in his assessment, he was still influenced
by prior perception coming out of the New Westminster court that “there were
apparently concerns about [my] mental health”. Of course, it was due to the
ugly truth I was trying to expose, i.e., the cover-up by the federal government
of a child abduction and murder crime, that the issue of my mental health came
up. (I did not know at the time of my protest that it was the RCMP who
perpetrated these hideous crimes against Cecilia Zhang and Tamra Keepness. And
as a facts-and-logic guy, I did not think that I had enough evidence on the
Tamra Keepness case to include it prominently during my protest.) As I wrote
recently, how else are the Canadian political class and the RCMP going to
defend the indefensible, i.e., an iconic national police force murdering its
own children? They had to either shut me up or certify me under the Mental
Health Act.
That was exactly what happened immediately after I
started blogging in the summer of 2004. Warren
Kinsella, among others in the C1P, suggested that I was imagining things and
therefore, delusional. That's also what happened immediately after my protest on the Pattullo Bridge on
October 31, 2005. The Crown Counsel brought up the issue of my mental health in
court. The mainstream media, when they reported on my protest at all, also
shifted the focus of my story from murder cover-up by the federal government to
my mental status. A news report in The
Province even stated unequivocally that I suffered from schizophrenia, some
two years before these doctors on order of the C1P finally “diagnosed” me with
this or a similar illness, i.e., paranoia delusion. Of course, the report had to be vague about the
source of that misinformation, although it appeared in the same sentence that
contained a quote from the New Westminster police. I would have to have a
lawyer to deal with such a blatant and deliberate lie about me on a newspaper.
When the federal government and the RCMP saw that
they could not force me to give up my cause, they utilized the court process to
force me go through these psychiatric assessments and examinations again and
again. In so doing, they achieved two major objectives. One was to eventually get
the result they had always wanted with respect to my mental status in order to
discredit my cause. The other was to use the process as a form of punishment
for my blowing the whistle on them. Indeed, these repeated assessments and/or
examinations amounted to unbelievable psychological violence and torture.
Finally, I would note that the two major conclusions
by Dr. McKibbin were: (1) that I was not certifiable under the Mental Health
Act; and (2) that I was clinically fit to stand trial. Also note that the date
of New Westminster court stamp on Dr. McKibbin’s original report was December
31, 2007, my last day in court for sentencing. In other words, it would appear that the Court
or the Crown Counsel in New Westminster has created the public impression that
it was only after they had put me through this tortuous legal process that they
suddenly “found” this earlier psychiatric report from more than 9 months before.
What a joke.
Update 20140724:
I don’t
want anyone get the impression that, just because I think my
first psychiatric assessment report, which was ordered by the Provincial Court
in Richmond, was not maliciously produced, there was no problem with the
Richmond Court. Quite the contrary, these two courts were so tightly
coordinated that one might say there was just one process. Indeed, insofar as my
court experience got increasingly nightmarish, the kangaroo court in
Richmond was much more blunt in its tactics than the one in New Westminster. You
can get a glimpse of that from this recent blog post of mine. And I may post
other details later.
